A title review tells you who may sell; a technical inspection tells you what is being sold. They are two separate engagements, both paid for by the buyer, and in Crespo the second one is usually skipped because the buyer is not in the city to open the door.
What gets inspected is not the same checklist for every property: when what you are buying is a beach lot, the report has to address what the nature of that property actually puts at risk, not a generic form about damp patches and sockets. That matters for money and for timing. For money, because a repair not found before the promesa de compraventa is signed gets paid for afterwards by the buyer, and in a propiedad horizontal (condominium regime) it can end up shared among all owners through a special assessment. For timing, because before the promesa whatever turns up is a matter for negotiation, and afterwards it is only a claim. The report is signed by a professional who answers for what it says; nobody signs the brochure.
A beach lot is bought differently because the first question is not what you may build but whether a private owner ever existed. Along the coastal strip you find land that could lawfully be granted, land that never left the public domain, and land someone occupied and then transferred without holding the right, so the chain of title may rest on mere possession or on falsa tradición, a transfer by someone who never held registered ownership. No deed, no notaría and no lapse of time fixes that, because property in the public domain cannot be acquired by prescription. Investigating the origin of title therefore outranks everything else and comes before any other conversation. The second difference is that the object itself moves: the shoreline advances or retreats, and the area shown on the folio may not be the land that is dry today. The third is that a substantial part of the terrain is not buildable at all, between the public strip, the ronda hídrica (protected water margin) and environmental setbacks, so the usable lot is always smaller than the lot purchased, and it is worth fixing that with a survey and with the environmental authority.
Here the file is complicated by a neighbor nobody negotiates with: the air terminal. The neighborhood sits under the approach path, so a building project is not reviewed only by the curaduría urbana, the private office that grants permits, but also by the civil aviation authority, which sets the obstacle limitation surfaces, and by the operator running the airport under concession. That reorders the procedure: before buying with any plan to add height, request the land-use opinion from the District and ask about the aviation ruling, because that is where a seller's assumptions collapse. On top of height there is noise exposure, which never appears on the certificado de tradición y libertad, the registry history and encumbrance certificate, and does appear in the airfield regime, so the exposure sits in the rules over the land rather than in the title itself. The counterparty differs too: a formal neighborhood of long-standing owners, with unsettled sucesiones, estate proceedings, and houses carved into several apartments without registering the split, so compare the original permit against what stands before accepting a per-unit valuation.
What is specific to Crespo
The neighborhood you cross to enter or leave the city: residential, fully built out and pressed against the air terminal, with its own seafront. Family houses and residential buildings sit alongside apartments used for short stays because of how close the terminal is. It is the hinge between downtown and the Zona Norte: the exit to the Anillo Vial and the way into Rafael Núñez airport both run through it.
- what building height the lot allows under the airport approach path, because the aviation restriction stacks on top of District zoning and is the first fact left out when a lot is offered
- whether what stands matches the permit and the registry folio, a common gap in family houses split into apartments without registering the split
- how shoreline protection in front of the property was resolved and which body answers for that work, because it is not the seller
What to verify, step by step
- Ask the curaduría urbana (the private permitting office) for the licencia de construcción and the approved plans, and check what use, area and height that permit actually authorised against what you are being shown. Anything built beyond it is not cured by the deed.
- What the report has to address point by point for a beach lot: where the zona de bajamar ends: it is public domain of the Nation, cannot be sold, and no private deed cures it; whether the lot has its own matrícula inmobiliaria or was never split out, and whether the chain of title carries falsa tradición (a transfer by someone who never held registered ownership) or mere possession and how much of the lot is actually buildable once the public strip, the ronda hídrica (protected water margin) and the environmental setback are taken out.
- And what the same report should pick up for the sector in Crespo: what building height the lot allows under the airport approach path, because the aviation restriction stacks on top of District zoning and is the first fact left out when a lot is offered; whether what stands matches the permit and the registry folio, a common gap in family houses split into apartments without registering the split and how shoreline protection in front of the property was resolved and which body answers for that work, because it is not the seller.
- Engage the visit with an engineer or architect you hire yourself, not the one the seller offers, and require a written report with dated photographs, a signature and the professional's licence number. Ask Camacol Bolívar who carries out technical surveys in the region and ask for references you can check.
- Agree in writing with the seller on the date of the visit and on access to the property before signing the promesa, and attach the report to the promesa together with the agreed repairs and who pays for them.
- Ask the District whether any administrative proceeding is open against the property for building without a permit or for breaching planning rules, because that follows the property and not the seller.
Mistakes that cost money
- Accepting the report the seller or the developer hands over. The useful report is the one the buyer commissioned and can question.
- Leaving the inspection until after the promesa, when the price is already agreed. Whatever surfaces then is argued from the weaker position.
- Confusing the technical inspection with the title review. One looks at the construction and the other at the chain of ownership; you need both, and not from the same person.
Frequently asked questions
- Can the inspection be done without being in Cartagena?
- Yes, and it usually is: you hire the professional, arrange access with the seller and receive the signed report. What you should not delegate is choosing who does it.
- Does the inspection change with the type of property?
- In substance, yes. What has to be verified on a beach lot comes from the nature of the property —what is privately owned, what is common property, what the permit authorises— and not from a general list of finishes.
- Who pays for repairs the report turns up?
- Whoever agreed to in writing. If the report is attached to the promesa with the fixes and who owes them, you have something to enforce; if it lives in an email, you do not.
Where to check it
- Curadurías Urbanas de Cartagena — whether a current building or subdivision permit exists and exactly what it authorises
- Camacol Bolívar — the industry's own figures on housing starts and launches in Bolívar
- Alcaldía Mayor de Cartagena de Indias — property tax, betterment levies and District procedures
- Cartagena de Indias — the rules of the municipality Crespo belongs to
Official bodies. Specific figures are requested there, not copied from a listing.
Updated 2026-11-06
Interested in a property in this area?
Write to us and we will send you the available options.